We talk all about more on Education.....

Showing posts with label Learning Design. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Learning Design. Show all posts
, , , , ,

HPSS and Seven Sharp - The School Behind the Soundbite



Dealing with media is an interesting exercise, simply because you don't know how they are going to portray you. After four hours of filming in the school it was hard to grasp which direction they might take it - would it be blindly celebratory (unlikely) or would it be all about perpetuating the myth that 'we are going to hell in a handbasket' due to the use of technology in schools (more likely). Luckily it was neither, it was (I thought) a balanced piece that began as many of our colleagues and community do, questioning whether the direction we are going is a wise idea and ending with the conviction that it was indeed a necessary change for the better...even if that message was undone a little by Mike Hosking's final throw away lines. But lets be honest, that was to be expected.




So in terms of how we were portrayed I was happy and I thank Frances Valentine, The Mind Lab, Gill Higgins and the Seven Sharp team for that. There has however been a few things that niggled away at me as the days passed by, the main thing being the misconceptions that people might have had by learning about our school via a few choicely selected soundbites and possibly reinforced by the throw away comments at the end. I suspect there are many folk out there that might be filling in the blanks and coming to the conclusion that our students independently direct themselves and their learning throughout the week and that curriculum coverage and learning might be not covering all the bases you might in a traditional school. For this reason I thought it might be useful to paint a fuller picture of what actually happens at the school behind the soundbites.

First up, what does a school week look like for Year 9 students at Hobsonville Point Secondary? Do they follow a timetable? Do they learn Maths? Yes they do! Have they ditched the pens and paper and wear what whatever the heck they like? No, not at all. Lets begin by looking at the weekly timetable. Students choose modules one term at a time - this allows them to personalise and pursue interests in in a way they might not normally be able to do in more traditional schools. Whilst they can choose the topics, themes and flavours of learning, they cannot choose whether or not they cover the normal spread of curriculum coverage. This is achieved by ensuring students choose a mix of modules that cover each of the learning areas. Subject teachers plan each term together to ensure they all teaching the same 'threshold concepts' from each learning area, i.e. no matter which module you pick that features English as a learning area this term, they will be cover ing the skills of close listening and speaking, the Maths modules all focus on Statistics...and so on and so forth. This ensures that ALL students will cover ALL learning area skills needed in Year 9 and 10 that will ensure they are able to achieve at Excellence come NCEA time.

So this is what their week looks like.


Every morning students meet with their Learning Coach (think form teacher on steroids) for a Learning Hub (see explanation of Learning Hub below). They spend 20 mins in a Learning Hub on Monday, Wednesday and Thursday and 90 mins with their Learning Coach on a Tuesday and Friday. This extended time allows for time for students to work with their Learning Coach to establish and track Learning Goals and time to reflect on their learning in an online portfolio, as well as time for regular one-to-one teacher-student conference time.

Learning Hubs
Learning Hubs will:
  • be small groups where caring relationships are fostered
  • provide learners with one key person who will connect with family and ensure learners are engaged in a relevant and challenging programme
  • explore learner interests in order to pursue passions, which can be linked back to learning
  • track progress and provide structures so learners, with their coaches and families, can maintain a learning portfolio
  • build on learners' capacities to be Inquirers and Self Directed Learners


On Mondays students spend the rest of their day in a Big Learning Module which is one of the types of Specialised Learning Modules offered throughout the week (see below for a definition of Specialised Learning Modules). A Big Learning Module is three teachers facilitating an integrated module that covers three learning areas. See this post to see a more detailed example. The whole structure makes it easy for school trips and outings to occur and allows for serious time for deep learning.

Specialised Learning Modules
Specialised Learning Modules:
  • will enable all students to gain coverage of curriculum areas and fluencies
  • will include a range of teaching & learning modes: co-constructed, seminar, workshop, flipped, online etc.
  • will encourage critical and creative thinking
  • will be framed by inquiry and involve independent learning activities
Learning Coaches will work with the students to create a LearnPath by selecting a range of modules that ensure curriculum and skills coverage. Beyond 2014 students will be able to be placed into modules based on curriculum levels suited to their readiness rather than based on their age.

Check out Specialised Learning Leader Steve Mouldey's post here for detail about Learning Modules

On a Tuesday after extended Learning Hub time students are engaged in a Big Project (see explanation below) - this year, each big project has run for two terms. The projects are large scale and tend to have a community wide focus and encourage students to think beyond themselves to address the needs of others. They also provide an opportunity for curriculum coverage, depending on their individual focus. For example, I am leading a project group looking at how we can use spoken word and speech to affect change - students will be exploring issues that concern them, such as political, environmental or social issues and will them create and perform spoken word or speech that aim to convey their message about the issue that they think is of concern for their community and/or generation. This provides opportunities for both English and Social Science learning along the way.

Project Learning
Students will be engaged in at least one project at any time.

This allows student choice through personal interest and develops lifelong skills of collaboration and complex problem-solving.

Big Projects: 
  • larger scale, links with internal or external expertise/mentors, business partnerships, community links, encourage social responsibility & citizenship
  • apply learning across curriculum areas with focus e.g. Wetlands
  • exposure to wide range of learning experiences, scope for student participation across range of roles
Passion Projects: 
  • individual/team initiated and negotiated interest based projects
  • encourage curiosity, grow passions and achieve excellence
You can check out Learning Partnership Leader Sarah Wakeford's blog here for more details.

On a Wednesday, Thursday and Friday students split their time between Small Modules (which are two learning areas and two teachers facilitating learning for two blocks of the day) and SPINS which are special interest modules that are one teacher, one learning area. This is where students learn Languages and where they can experience learning in a more singular focused way if they prefer - SPINS on offer this term include - Active Recreation, English, Maths, Technology and the Arts.

To understand what a Small Module might look like you can check a reflection of the Small Module I did last term here, or a couple examples of Math/PE modules I write about here. 

Another feature of our timetable is the 50 min blocks called MyTime which run Monday to Thursday. These are blocks of time that students can negotiate what they do on a weekly basis. Students complete a Google Form (an online survey tool) to select from a range of options such as 'floor-time' with specific teachers, sports, reading, independent study, gaming, coding, robotics, arts, music or numeracy or literacy extension or support (Learning Coaches ensure students who need extra support or extension choose these at least once every week). This is where we are nurturing this idea of self-direction, albeit in a very supported way.

So there you have it. Our Year 9s are learning all of the traditional learning area skills and concepts, but maybe not in the way that is typical in secondary schools at the moment. They have a lot more opportunity to choose the flavour of their learning, they do not have the option to opt out. As an educator in my 17th year of teaching secondary students I have been blown away by the depth of learning going on here and the way our learners can articulate what, why and how they are learning. The way that the integration of learning areas provides a genuine context for skills from other learning areas seems to be supporting our learners to really 'get' the skills and understand why those Maths and English are relevant in school and beyond. 

And as far as technology is concerned, HPSS is not about "ditching the pen and paper", it is simply about using the technology we use every day, in the 'real world'  in the classroom. We are about blended learning not technology - see this post for more detail.

If you are still worried at all about student's NCEA preparedness at HPSS, you needn't be. We are ensuring the groundwork is happening and as for NCEA itself it is actually incredibly flexible and is assessed standard by standard in each learning area, which means it could be easily delivered through integrated modules if we wanted to go that way. We are already working with NZQA who run NCEA and they are genuinely excited to see a school who is approaching the qualification as it was designed to be approached - a veritable buffet of standards that can mixed and matched to evidence the learning that is already happening - not a fixed menu of standards that was designed to be used as a manual for designing singular senior courses (where more often than not the assessment tail wags the curricular dog).

Finally, I do want address one of Mike Hosking's comments. When he said young people aren't capable of managing or directing themselves it really irked me. If there is one thing I have learned in all my years as an educator it is this - young people are pretty much capable of as much or as little as you think they are. Underestimate them and it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Expect great things from them, support and nurture them and they are pretty much capable of anything and they are most definitely capable of self-directed learning if you support them to be. 

And if you are still not convinced, check out the five year olds at our sister school Hobsonville Point Primary who plan and direct their learning on a daily basis. 
Share:
Read More
, , , , , ,

Hack Your Classroom - Week Three: Introduction to Design Thinking


Source: http://dschool.stanford.edu/dgift/
What is Design Thinking?

“Design thinking is a human-centered approach to innovation that draws from the designer's toolkit to integrate the needs of people, the possibilities of technology, and the requirements for business success.” —Tim Brown, president and CEO

Thinking like a designer can transform the way organizations develop products, services, processes, and strategy. This approach, which IDEO calls design thinking, brings together what is desirable from a human point of view with what is technologically feasible and economically viable. It also allows people who aren’t trained as designers to use creative tools to address a vast range of challenges.

Design thinking is a deeply human process that taps into abilities we all have but get overlooked by more conventional problem-solving practices. It relies on our ability to be intuitive, to recognize patterns, to construct ideas that are emotionally meaningful as well as functional, and to express ourselves through means beyond words or symbols. Nobody wants to run an organization on feeling, intuition, and inspiration, but an over-reliance on the rational and the analytical can be just as risky. Design thinking provides an integrated third way.

The design thinking process is best thought of as a system of overlapping spaces rather than a sequence of orderly steps. There are three spaces to keep in mind: inspiration, ideation, and implementation. Inspiration is the problem or opportunity that motivates the search for solutions. Ideation is the process of generating, developing, and testing ideas. Implementation is the path that leads from the project stage into people’s lives.

Under this system, IDEO uses both analytical tools and generative techniques to help clients see how their new or existing operations could look in the future — and build road maps for getting there. Our methods include business model prototyping, data visualization, innovation strategy, organizational design, qualitative and quantitative research, and IP liberation.

All of IDEO’s work is done in consideration of the capabilities of our clients and the needs of their customers. As we iterate toward a final solution, we assess and reassess our designs. Our goal is to deliver appropriate, actionable, and tangible strategies. The result: new, innovative avenues for growth that are grounded in business viability and market desirability.

Source: http://www.ideo.com/about/

If you want to learn more, you could do the Stanford Design Think Crash Course here:



For me personally, my interest in design thinking as a learning design model was born out of a visit to Nueva School and meeting Design Thinking guru Kim Saxe. At Nueva School Saxe has taken the D. School design thinking model and has re-visioned it as a learning design model which sees students undertake inquiry in a way that insures they have an empathetic real world context. Below is a copy of her model and an excerpt from my blog post following my visit.

Source: http://designthinking.nuevaschool.org/dt-diagram

Nueva School is passionate about Design Thinking and Design Engineering. They have a Design Thinking Institute and Innovation Lab led by Kim Saxe. To me, this aspect of the school was the key to its success. It was also the aspect of the school which in a sense really exemplified what the NZC is all about. Students in this space developed Key Competencies. Their focus on real world learning and focus on empathy meant that it covered the Values and Principles as outlined in the NZC as well. The Design Thinking process they use has been developed by Kim Saxe, based on the Stanford model. It is a inquiry model and thinking process, not unlike the one used in our Technology curriculum. It is however a process that can be used across the curriculum. The real point of difference (for me at least) was the inclusion of empathy in the cycle. A great example of this was the 6th grade Health Innovation programme where students work with a person with health issues, identify needs of health care. Whilst students are not expected to find cures, they do focus on the human experience and identify issues that may have solutions. In one example given, a number of students happened to be working with people with similar illnesses and discovered that each suffered as a result of having to work through a number of different treatments to find which one suited needs, the students identified that if the patients had been informed of all choices up front and able to choose, this could have prevented much of the "trial and error" the patients experienced. 

The focus on empathy and social action is woven throughout the curriculum at Nueva. Students don't just take "Business Studies" they instead learn and explore Social Entrepreneurship. They also learn a language of choice throughout using this as a platform for exploring world issues and social action on global level. Students learned about the country of their language and even engaged in a longterm in depth inquiry around designing and building an Eco house in the country they were focusing on. In the final year of the middle school, all students then spend two weeks in that country, one with a host family and the other exploring the country itself.


Inquiry was everywhere at Nueva. All students engaged in inquiries for each of the subjects, with much of the final two months of the school year being dedicated to inquiries in preparation for their "culmination" presentations which (I think) were basically an opportunity for students to present and celebrate their learning. Another core value of the school is collaboration and "collective knowledge", therefore presentations may be in groups or individual depending on how the learning took place.Students also engaged in a passion project in Middle School. The project was based on something the student is passionate about and also betters the world (that component is optional but 2/3s still opt in).Students have a mentor outside of the school and the project is very much based in the "real world". Students also participate in self-initiated projects that they engage in at lunchtime.


Source: HPSS Learning Design Model
At HPSS we, in a sense, began with the Stanford and Nueva School design thinking model, then the 'Specialised Learning Leaders' went through a process of 'deconstructing' or 'hacking the NZC' looking for the learning design model that existed within it. From this process the above learning design model was born. Visually it looks somewhat similar to the Nueva School design thinking model (and it was inspired in part by this) but look more closely and you will see that all of the words are actually pulled from the New Zealand Curriculum.

For me it is key to creating a more student directed model of teaching and learning, encouraging a way of teaching that is about students actively seeking knowledge rather than passively rote learning screeds of information. 

So how do you see design thinking aligning with how you you approach inquiry? Is inquiry central to your teaching practice? 
Share:
Read More
, , , , ,

Courageous Sharing at HPSS



This afternoon my co-DPs and I had the opportunity to share our curriculum structures at EdChallenge (a PLG for senior leadership teams organised by the Albany Senior High School - thank you for including us!). It was awesome and terrifying to have an opportunity to attempt to articulate a year's thinking in a little over 20 minutes. A few things struck me. For one, we have done A LOT of thinking and we have come along way. It was great to hear Di and Lea share their journey with their teams in developing and realising visions for our Learning Design and Learning Relationships respectively. Their leadership has resulted in some incredibly deep thinking. 
Interestingly, we have remained true to our original thinking in Term One and indeed Maurie's and the BOTs vision from the year prior. However, on closer inspection, we have absolutely grown and built on these initial plans as we have welcomed on more and more of our team on board. There was a real sense of collaboration and leadership driving what was presented today (see above).

What was also evident was a sense of a thinking journey. We began the year with a period of convergent thinking - developing as a small team a strong nucleus or core to our structure. Then as teams were introduced we entered a phase of divergent thinking so as to develop different strands such as specialised learning, learning teams, project learning and professional learning. We now seemed to have come full circle with a need to become convergent once more so as to streamline our thinking and our taxonomies. This cycle will undoubtedly repeat itself as we continue to evolve, and may form a useful structure for 'leading as inquiry' process over the coming years. Converging to locate our next focus or priority and then diverging to explore solutions and opportunities. This echoes an interesting cycle of collaboration and autonomy - a cycle which seems integral to collaborative leadership being sustainable in the longterm.

Another thing that struck me as I left for home (only slightly traumatised by such an act of unbridled and uncensored sharing), is that we are bloody brave. In fact we are all brave at HPSS. Throughout this developmental foetal like stage we have basically been sharing our ultrasounds with the world! Guts and all, we have shared our thinking, our ideas, our challenges and and our excitement (not looking at anyone in particular Mouldey). 

This is awesome and something we should remember to celebrate. For this reason, I would like to dedicate this post to my courageous colleagues who have been sharing their learning and thinking online and face to face. 

And here we are, warts and all, the HPSS bloggers:

Senior Leadership Team

Specialised Learning Leaders

Learning Team Leaders

Project Learning Team

Professional Learning Team

Share:
Read More